retrospect​ ​的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列懶人包和總整理

Rise of the Dolphins

為了解決retrospect​ ​的問題，作者 這樣論述：

Doug Swift is without doubt one of the most interesting people ever to play in the NFL. From 1970-1975, Doug was the starting strongside linebacker for the Miami Dolphins and during his six-year career, he played in three Super Bowls, won two rings, and was a key member of the 1972 squad that to

this day is the only team in the history of the NFL to post a perfect season. On paper, it would appear that Doug had no business playing professional football. He didn’t have the right pedigree. He hadn’t gone to a big-time football school like Alabama, Ohio State, Michigan, USC, Texas, or even Syr

acuse, the college team he grew up watching in his hometown. Instead, Doug went to little Amherst College which played an eight-game schedule in Division III with no playoffs. In addition to this lack of experience and training, for a professional football player Doug wasn’t exceptionally big, fast,

or mobile, agile, and hostile as Bear Bryant liked his players. So, how did Doug do it? He maintains that his success was due to a combination of discipline, determination, and doggedness, or as he is quick to note, While I wasn’t always the best, I made sure I was always the most determined. In ad

dition to being very determined, Doug was very smart and early in his football career developed the ability to sense what was going to happen before it happened, and then put himself in the right position for when it happened. With this unique feel for the game, it is no coincidence that Doug compil

ed one of the best, if not the best games started/games won ratio of anyone who ever played in the NFL for at least six years. As Coach Shula said when Doug announced his retirement, Like a lot of guys who played on the No- Name Defense, Doug never received the individual credit he deserved, but in

retrospect, I can say that he was as smart, dedicated, and determined as any player I ever coached. Not too bad for a kid from little Amherst College.

The Outlier: The Unfinished Presidency of Jimmy Carter

為了解決retrospect​ ​的問題，作者Bird, Kai 這樣論述：

＂Important . . . [a] landmark presidential biography . . . Bird is able to build a persuasive case that the Carter presidency deserves this new look.＂--The New York Times Book ReviewAn essential re-evaluation of the complex triumphs and tragedies of Jimmy Carter’s presidential legacy--from the exper

t biographer and Pulitzer Prize-winning co-author of American PrometheusFour decades after Ronald Reagan’s landslide win in 1980, Jimmy Carter’s one-term presidency is often labeled a failure; indeed, many Americans view Carter as the only ex-president to have used the White House as a stepping-ston

e to greater achievements. But in retrospect the Carter political odyssey is a rich and human story, marked by both formidable accomplishments and painful political adversity. In this deeply researched, brilliantly written account, Pulitzer Prize-winning biographer Kai Bird deftly unfolds the Carter

saga as a tragic tipping point in American history. As president, Carter was not merely an outsider; he was an outlier. He was the only president in a century to grow up in the heart of the Deep South, and his born-again Christianity made him the most openly religious president in memory. This outl

ier brought to the White House a rare mix of humility, candor, and unnerving self-confidence that neither Washington nor America was ready to embrace. Decades before today’s public reckoning with the vast gulf between America’s ethos and its actions, Carter looked out on a nation torn by race and de

moralized by Watergate and Vietnam and prescribed a radical self-examination from which voters recoiled. The cost of his unshakable belief in doing the right thing would be losing his re-election bid--and witnessing the ascendance of Reagan. In these remarkable pages, Bird traces the arc of Carter’s

administration, from his aggressive domestic agenda to his controversial foreign policy record, taking readers inside the Oval Office and through Carter’s battles with both a political establishment and a Washington press corps that proved as adversarial as any foreign power. Bird shows how issues

still hotly debated today--from national health care to growing inequality and racism to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict--burned at the heart of Carter’s America, and consumed a president who found a moral duty in solving them. Drawing on interviews with Carter and members of his administration and

recently declassified documents, Bird delivers a profound, clear-eyed evaluation of a leader whose legacy has been deeply misunderstood. The Outlier is the definitive account of an enigmatic presidency--both as it really happened and as it is remembered in the American consciousness. Kai Bird is

an award-winning historian and journalist. Executive Director of the Leon Levy Center for Biography, he is the acclaimed author of biographies of John J. McCloy and of McGeorge and William Bundy. He won the Pulitzer Prize for Biography for American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Op

penheimer (co-authored with Martin J. Sherwin). His work includes critical writings on the Vietnam War, Hiroshima, nuclear weapons, the Cold War, the Arab-Israeli conflict, and the CIA. He lives in New York City and Washington, D.C., with his wife, Susan Goldmark.

父女間親子界限對成年初顯期女性自傷行為之預測：以述情障礙為中介預測變項

為了解決retrospect​ ​的問題，作者李琦萱 這樣論述：

本研究目的在於探討成年初顯期女性自傷行為現況以及華人父女界限類型之內涵，並從界限、述情障礙、自傷行為兩兩變項間的關係，檢視界限對述情障礙與自傷行為之預測力，以及述情障礙對自傷行為之預測力，進而探討述情障礙在其中的中介預測效果。 本研究以線上的問卷調查法進行，使用親子互動行為量表、述情障礙量表及自我傷害量表做為研究工具，並以台灣成年初顯期女性為研究對象，預試研究收集264份有效樣本以修訂量表；而正式研究則收回528份有效樣本，以檢證本研究問題與假設。研究結果顯示：1. 不同背景變項下的女性之自傷行為沒有顯著差異。2. 父女間屬於權威侵犯或矛盾糾結的界限類型，女兒會有較高的述情

障礙；而屬於權威侵犯的界限類型，女兒會有較多的自傷行為。3. 父女界限可預測女兒之述情障礙程度。4. 父女之間的「彼此親密行為」並無法預測女兒自傷行為的發生，而愈多的「彼此追逃行為」會使女兒愈容易產生自傷行為。5. 女性的述情障礙可預測其自傷行為。6. 述情障礙在「彼此親密行為」與自傷行為之間具完全中介預測效果，在「彼此追逃行為」與自傷行為之間則具部分中介預測效果。 本研究的主要結論包括：父女界限會影響個體情緒辨識與表達功能的發展，其中彼此追逃行為的影響力遠勝於彼此親密行為。而當個體在情緒辨識與表達遭遇困難，則非常可能導致自傷行為。