Multi Commander的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列懶人包和總整理

Peacekeeping in Darfur: The Dilemmas of an African Union-Un Force Commander

為了解決Multi Commander的問題，作者Agwai, Martin Luther,Fasakin, Akinbode 這樣論述：

In 2007, Martin Luther Agwai was deployed to Darfur as Force Commander of UNAMID, which, as the first African Union-UN hybrid mission, was to become the largest peacekeeping operation in the world. Four years earlier, Darfur had imploded, descending into violent conflicts. The international commu

nity - in the form of both activists and state actors - felt it could not remain uninvolved lest a genocide on the scale of Rwanda occurred. Despite such lofty intentions, UNAMID proved to be high on promise but low on commitment and delivery. Ultimately, it failed to address the conflicts taking pl

ace, much less build a sustainable peace. Agwai provides unique insight into what went wrong in Darfur, and the myriad challenges facing international peacekeeping operations more generally. Crucially, he highlights the lack of multi-level cooperation between the people of Darfur and the intervening

parties, and how the absence of a bottom-up approach to peacebuilding works against peace being both achieved and maintained.

Cyber Persistence Theory: Redefining National Security in Cyberspace

為了解決Multi Commander的問題，作者Fischerkeller, Michael P.,Goldman, Emily O.,Harknett, Richard J. 這樣論述：

A bold re-conceptualization of the fundamentals driving behavior and dynamics in cyberspace.Most cyber operations and campaigns fall short of activities that states would regard as armed conflict. In Cyber Persistence Theory, Michael P. Fischerkeller, Emily O. Goldman, and Richard J. Harknett argue

that a failure to understand this strategic competitive space has led many states tomisapply the logic and strategies of coercion and conflict to this environment and, thus, suffer strategic loss as a result. The authors show how the paradigm of deterrence theory can neither explain nor manage the p

reponderance of state cyber activity. They present a new theory that illuminates theexploitive, rather than coercive, dynamics of cyber competition and an analytical framework that can serve as the basis for new strategies of persistence. Drawing on their policy experience, they offer a new set of p

rescriptions to guide policymakers toward a more stable, secure cyberspace. Michael Fischerkeller is a research staff member in the Information, Technology and Systems Division at the Institute for Defense Analyses, a Federally Funded Research and Development Center. Michael has spent his entire p

rofessional career supporting the Office of the Secretary of Defense, JointChiefs of Staff, Combatant and Multi-National Force commanders, and the Intelligence Community. His areas of expertise are cyber strategy, strategic / operational concept development, and analysis / assessment. Emily O. Goldm

an serves as a strategist at US Cyber Command and a thought leader on cyber policy. She was cyber advisor to the Director of Policy Planning at the Department of State, 2018-19. From 2014 to 2018, she directed the US Cyber Command / National Security Agency Combined Action Group, reporting to a four

-star commander and leading a team that wrote the 2018 US Cyber Command vision, Achieve and Maintain Cyberspace Superiority. She has also worked as a strategic communications advisor for US Central Command and for the Coordinator for Counterterrorism at the State Department. Sheholds a doctorate in

Political Science from Stanford University and was a Professor of Political Science at the University of California, Davis, for two decades. Dr. Goldman has published and lectured widely on strategy, cybersecurity, arms control, military history and innovation, andorganizational change. Richard J. H

arknett is Professor and Director of the School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Cincinnati. He also co-directs the Ohio Cyber Range Institute, a state-wide organization supporting education, workforce, economic, and research development in cybersecurity. Heserved as Scholar-

in-Residence at US Cyber Command and National Security Agency and has held two Fulbright Professor positions.

形成中的反中聯盟？威脅平衡理論4.0

為了解決Multi Commander的問題，作者吳昭穎 這樣論述：

伴隨中共的崛起，東亞、亞太、乃至印太地區形成反中聯盟，一直是廣受矚目的議題。近期以來，美中貿易戰爆發，新冠肺炎肆虐，美中關係江河日下，美、日、印、澳四方也動作頻頻，反中聯盟似乎也箭在弦上。然而，對於此一關鍵的當前議題，能否有更大時空涵蓋的理論視角？國際關係學界有威脅平衡理論的研究，相對於原始的1.0版威脅平衡理論，改良後刪除威脅認知的2.0版威脅平衡理論，以及採用威脅認知的3.0版威脅平衡理論，本文嘗試承接並延伸這理論的發展，擬提出更新的4.0版威脅平衡理論，發展更精確的指標來衡量抗衡的程度，以檢驗2.0版出現之後，2010年迄今的發展。