core翻譯的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列懶人包和總整理

The Poets Laureate of the Long Eighteenth Century, 1668-1813: Courting the Public

為了解決core翻譯的問題，作者 這樣論述：

A history of the development and importance of the office of poet laureate of Britain. The office of the poet laureate of Britain was a highly prominent, relevant, and respectable institution throughout the long eighteenth century. First instituted for John Dryden in 1668, the laureateship develo

ped from an honorific into a functionary office with a settled position in court, and in 1813 was bestowed upon Robert Southey, whose tenure transformed the office. Taking an interdisciplinary approach, this book examines the office’s institutional changes and public reception, the mechanics of each

laureate’s appointment, and the works produced by the laureates before and after their appointments. It argues that the laureateship played a key part in some of the most vital trends in eighteenth-century culture. At the core of the book is a new research paradigm that Leo Shipp calls the concept

ual geography of culture. It shows that Britons routinely used spatial concepts to understand culture throughout the period, which became increasingly abstract over time. As part of this, Shipp shows, the court evolved from a concrete space in London to an abstract space capable of hosting the entir

e British public. The laureateship was a dynamic office positioned at the interface of court and public, evolving in line with its audiences. An important intervention in eighteenth-century historiography, this book presents a nuanced understanding of eighteenth-century culture and society, in which

the laureateship exemplified the enduring centrality of the court to the British conceptual geography of culture.

core翻譯進入發燒排行的影片

關於沈浸自己，我說的其實是

為了解決core翻譯的問題，作者陳冠中 這樣論述：

此書面報告書寫從個人迷戀於「音」出發，回溯「音」愛好者的身份過渡到 以「音」作為創作思考的歷程，爬梳「音」與聲音藝術間之外的研究，進而追究 「音」作為主體之下，去聲音藝術化的「音」，如何勾勒出「音」的主體性。在 此「音」主體性的建構過程，必需同時進行解構主體性化，也就是說當「音」有 了結構性的系統，「音」也就不在是「音」了。以「音」作為書寫(創作)的對 象，本身就極為弔詭，「音」是無法明確地被定義的，當本文試圖接近「音」主體 性的過程，以及「音」作為創作的思考對象，便是「音」趨向消逝死亡的時刻， 「音」始終面對自身的抵抗性，不得不提醒筆者在整個書寫過程(創作

過程)，需 要摧毀書寫結構(作品的形式內容)。以上的文字原寫於西元二零二一年三月十八日， 改寫於西元二零二一年十一月三十日，這些文字以「先將來時」的時態預言著未來， 我在西元二零二一年九月二十三日決定摧毀書寫結構的這一個動作。「只好做壞自己」，是經過疫情之後，重新梳理自我與創作的關係，原先關於「音」 的章節書寫，只保留了「噪動史」的部分放在後記裡面。書寫主軸將重新定位在新作 上面。《代號:劇場的原始積累》因疫情取消公開展演，在無法繼續往下推動進展之 下，取而代之的是，奠基在「只要不睡覺，就會有時間了」這一句話為核心發展的作 品，保留了「無線電」聲音技術作為發展，但這個作品並不是要直接以劇場的

形式去 回應有關劇場的勞動問題，《非得要錯過些什麼》透過與表演者的共創，試圖從「活」 的身體擾動展覽的界線，製造出非在場的真實。

Rationality and Interpretation: On the Identities of Language

為了解決core翻譯的問題，作者Evans, David 這樣論述：

Taking a unique approach which combines sociolinguistics with theoretical linguistics, this book presents a view of language and grammar as both a cognitive and socio-cultural phenomena. Beginning with Bakhtin’s theories of conceptual grammar and lexico-grammar, this book encompasses a broad phil

osophical range, engaging with the ideas of key figures such as Bergson, Chomsky, Derrida and Wittgenstein. Drawing on their work, it investigates how language progresses from an inner reflection of the rational mind to develop social and ideological aspects as it interacts with culture. In doing so

, it shows how identity is unitary and rational at the linguistic core whilst multiple social identities are simultaneously shaped by linguistic differences at the cultural peripheries. Encompassing theoretical linguistics, cognitive linguistics, discourse analysis, multilingualism, sociolinguistics

and semiotics, Rationality and Interpretation demonstrates how the different branches of linguistics can complement each other and highlights the socio-cultural influences of language development, as well as how language development is shaped by those influences.

營建工程契約保固制度之研究

為了解決core翻譯的問題，作者何一民 這樣論述：

近年來，國內雖以高科技工業如半導體產業為經濟發展核心，以往的工業火車頭「建築、營造工業」成長動能已日漸趨緩，然而，政府意識到前瞻建設計畫之運行、社會住宅及都更危老改建需求仍仰賴於營造工業，遂逐步採取許多改革措施諸如政策性擴張投資、協助技術創新與轉型、完善營造法制環境等，以期帶動營造產業之復甦。其中關於法制現況，工程履約流程中最為常見的議題，除承包商應如期完工外，莫過於工程瑕疵衍生之爭端，此殊值業主與承包商重視。事實上，民法與工程相關法令雖有瑕疵救濟規範，卻不足以因應實務上變化多端之瑕疵紛爭，因此，本論文擬以工程產生瑕疵時應如何救濟作為研究目標。工程生命週期中產生瑕疵並受業主發現的時點，區分為

承商施工期間、業主驗收程序與業主使用階段，雙方就上述三個階段產生之瑕疵該如何處理並界定法律關係？本論文主軸承商之保固責任究係上述三項階段中之哪一階段？為何民法承攬針對工作物瑕疵已存有物之瑕疵擔保責任，還需另行創設保固制度？此兩制度之關聯性何在？應如何精準操作？均為本論文所關切之議題。正因我國工程保固法制諸多概念沿襲英美工程契約所慣用條款，並逐步發展成工程慣例，法律人員在無法正確理解保固制度發展脈絡之情況下，時常誤解法律關係進而錯誤適用法律。職此，誠有必要釐清工程保固制度之基本架構與其性質所屬，方能重新認識工程保固制度並定紛止爭工程瑕疵之疑慮。此外，業主若藉定型化契約之手，針對工程瑕疵設計出風險

分配不甚公平、合理的保固條款，承商該如何應對？保固條款若有所缺漏，應如何進行契約漏洞之填補？此時，民法承攬之瑕疵擔保規範與FIDIC國際營建工程契約又扮演著何種要角？工程裁判實務上針對瑕疵之重要爭議又該如何精確地解決？亦為本論文研究方向。以下，本論文將陸續梳理上述爭議並提出一己之見，希冀能夠勾勒出一套完整的工程瑕疵救濟制度，創造美好的工程法制環境。