Plead with的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列懶人包和總整理

A Very Canadian Coup: How Duplicity, Disloyalty, and a Fear of Losing Power Brought Down Prime Minister MacKenzie Bowell and Can

為了解決Plead with的問題，作者Glenn, Ted 這樣論述：

A fresh take on the Manitoba schools question and the Conservative Coup that toppled Canada’s fifth prime minister.When Mackenzie Bowell became Canada’s fifth Prime Minister in December 1894, everyone -- including Bowell -- expected the job would involve nothing more than keeping the wheels on th

e Conservative wagon until a spring election.Plans for a quiet caretaker-ship were dashed in January 1895 when the courts ruled that the Manitoba government had violated Roman Catholics’ constitutional rights by abolishing the provincial separate school system back in 1890. Catholics in Quebec deman

ded that Bowell force Manitoba to restore the schools, while Ontario Protestants warned him to keep his hands off.Backed into a corner, Bowell tried three times to negotiate a compromise with Manitoba over the course of 1895, but to no avail. By January 1896, seven of Bowell’s cabinet ministers had

had enough. Convinced Bowell had tarnished the Conservative brand, the caballers forced Bowell to resign and make way for a new leader who they believed could revive party fortunes in time for the coming election, the old Warhorse of Cumberland himself, Sir Charles Tupper.Ultimately, the coup didn’t

matter. Tupper and his conspirators plead their case in Parliament and on the hustings, but nothing could stand in the way of Wilfrid Laurier and his Liberals’ historic rise to power in the June 1896 election.A Very Canadian Coup brings fresh sources and new perspectives to bear on the life and tim

es of Canada’s fifth -- and least understood -- Prime Minister and his Sixth Ministry.

Plead with進入發燒排行的影片

權力轉移與種族主義：以當代美國為例

為了解決Plead with的問題，作者劉忠明 這樣論述：

「權力轉移理論」是1958年所出現的觀點，主張整個國際體系是一個層級型的金字塔社會，當原先在頂端的有支配性強權，與興起中次級強權間的實力差距，從懸殊變得接近時，此一權力轉移的現象將會導致體系的不穩定，增加戰爭發生機率。後來，經過持續的發展，權力轉移理論進一步認為，權力轉移的本身並不一定會帶來戰爭，還取決於興起中次級強權對既有支配性強權，是否感到滿意。然而，究竟是甚麼因素導致這滿意與不滿意呢？為什麼既有支配性強權不肯給予興起中次等強權滿意的對待呢？在既有的研究中尚缺乏討論。對此，本文主張，興起中次等強權的不滿，來自於既有支配強權的種族主義，並以美國興起的歷史為例加以驗證。

The Double Mother

為了解決Plead with的問題，作者Bussi, Michel/ Taylor, Sam (TRN) 這樣論述：

From the author of the "wonderfully ingenious" (Marilyn Stasio, New York Times Book Review) novel After The Crash comes a brilliant work of deception that dives deep into the psyche of a child and cruel game of manipulating a person's memory.Four-year-old Malone Moulin is haunted by nightmares of

being handed over to a complete stranger and begins claiming his mother is not his real mother. His teachers at school say that it is all in his imagination as his mother has a birth certificate, photos of him as a child and even the pediatrician confirms Malone is her son. The school psychologist,

Vasily, believes otherwise as the child vividly describes an exchange between two women. Vasily begins recording their conversations and reinterprets the creatures Malone uses in the childish tales he recounts to his stuffed toy to piece the story together as much as he can. Convinced that Malone i

s telling the truth, Vasile approaches police commander Marianne Augresse with the case, who has been searching for a gang of thieves that robbed a luxury store and left a couple dead in the neighboring town of Deauville to no avail. Not knowing why a child would lie and with perhaps her own own mat

ernal and protective instinct kicking in, Marianne takes Vasile's plead for help seriously. Marianne and her team soon discern that Malone's memory is in the hands of those around him; the cold members of the Moulin family and the people that they associate themselves with. With Malone's recollectio

n of the past quickly fading to give way to pirates, animals and other more innocent thoughts children have at his age, Marianne is desperate to find a through line. Well-crafted and showcasing the fragility of a child's cognition, The Double Mother is a riveting investigation to follow.

精神障礙被告就審能力問題之研究

為了解決Plead with的問題，作者李緻柔 這樣論述：

近年來精神障礙犯罪問題頻頻發生於社會，對於相關責任能力的探討，已有眾多文獻，然而在我國有關精神障礙被告就審能力的討論與法條適用卻非常不足，讓許多精神障礙者於法庭上無法與辯護人進行合作、無法理解法庭作用等等，對於其訴訟權利的保障是否足夠顯有疑慮，在我國，就審能力的問題並沒有明確的定義與規範，大致可從我國刑事訴訟法第294條第1項及第298條所訂定的停止審判之障礙事由的條文以及若該停止審判的障礙事由消滅後應續行審判的規定，進而來推敲出有關就審能力的規定。不過事實上單就法條立法文字觀看，以及法條訂立時背後的規範意義，立法者皆沒有明確提及相關概念，所以事實上難以看出該條的規定是基於保障被告的就審能力

，而相關的學理上討論亦不充足。其中有關「心神喪失」的用語並未同刑法第19條修正時一併修正，造成使用上產生問題與疑慮，過去最高法院26年度渝上字第237號判例以「對於外界事務全然缺乏知覺理會及判斷作用」做認定，過度限縮了「心神喪失」適用範圍，造成精神障礙被告就審能力適用範圍亦被限縮，而僅在非常極端情況下才有可能適用，即有可能對被告憲法上的正當法律程序、公平審判原則、辯護權等有所侵害。另外依據美國法上關於就審能力的討論已經行之有年，故本文將探討美國法上有關就審能力適用的利弊，看是否有相關法理可以借鏡適用於我國。另外我國立法院於2014年通過《身心障礙者權利公約施行法》，賦予《身心障礙者權利公約》內

國法之效力，而另外從《身心障礙者權利公約》對於身心障礙權益保障的角度出發，來重新以平等權概念審視這些已經內國法化的國際權利公約在精神障礙者就審能力議題上的內容與因應又該如何適用，最後以我國目前法條不足需修正的部分提出在未來可以的立法建議方向。