Not otherwise的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列懶人包和總整理

Quantitative Literary Analysis of Aphra Behn’’s Works

為了解決Not otherwise的問題，作者Runge, Laura L. 這樣論述：

Aphra Behn (1640-1689), prolific and popular playwright, poet, novelist, and translator, has a fascinating and extensive corpus of literature that plays a key role in literary history. The book offers an analysis of all of Behn’s literary output. It examines the author’s use of words in terms of

frequencies and distributions, and stacks the oeuvre in order to read Behn’s word usage synchronically. This experimental analysis of Behn’s literary corpus aims to provide a statistical overview of Behn’s writing and a study of her works according to the logic of the concordance. The analysis demon

strates the interpretive potential of digital corpus work, and it provides a fascinating reading of synchronic patterns in Behn’s writing. The book aims to augment the practice of close-reading by facilitating the rapid moves from full corpus to unique subsets, individual texts, and specific passage

s. It facilitates the connections among works that share verbal structures that would otherwise not register in diachronic reading. Each chapter focuses on one type of writing: poetry, drama, and prose. The chapters begin with an overview of the documents that make up the corpus for the genre (e.g.

the 80 published poems attributed to Behn in her lifetime; 18 plays and 12 prose works). A section on statistical commonplaces follows (length of texts, vocabulary density, and most frequent words). Interesting textual examples are explored in more detail for provocative close readings. The statisti

cs then are contextualized with the general language reference corpus for a discussion of keywords. Each chapter features a unique comparative study that illustrates Behn in a specific context. Each chapter analyzes a specific genre and comparative statistical experiments within the genre. The concl

usion compares all three genres to provide a study of Aphra Behn’s oeuvre as a whole. The discussion is focused through the lens of Behn’s most remarkable words. The keywords for her oeuvre as compared to the literary works in the general language reference (fifteen texts) when the proper names and

stage directions are removed to provide an index of Behn’s characteristic themes and qualities: oh, young, lover, love, marry, charming, heart, gay, soft, goes. Each of these words opens a window on her corpus as a whole. A unique case study of a significant author using new literary methodologies,

this book provides an appealing snapshot of Behn’s whole career informed by deep knowledge of the Restoration era and developments in digital humanities and cultural analytics.

Not otherwise進入發燒排行的影片

政府採購停權制度之研究

為了解決Not otherwise的問題，作者戴芝儀 這樣論述：

我國政府採購法之停權制度明定拒絕不良廠商參加投標及作為決標或分包，其立法理由係為杜絕廠商違法及違約行為，避免不良廠商再次危害其他機關，建立良性競爭環境，惟政府採購法之停權制度於實務執行上有許多質疑及爭議。因此，該制度設計是否符合公平、正義原則及具備維護市場交易秩序之功能，實有探討之必要。我國政府採購法停權制度屬行政罰之性質，亦應適用行政罰法之競合理論規範，惟若廠商之行為同時構成多款停權事由，如何正確判斷違反事項與執行停權程序確實是一大難題。目前實務上相關採購停權爭訟於法院審理時，法官之裁判幾乎都是針對廠商及機關間所提出構成停權事由之要件該當與否，並無審視可能之構成各款停權事由競合之問題及處理

方式。主管機關行政院公共工程委員會雖有注意實務上可能發生各款競合適用之問題，然僅於105年頒布之「刊登不良廠商執行注意事項」中規範第1款（或第2款）與第6款之適用及處理原則，並未通盤釋明各種競合態樣之處理方式，在立法者及法院實務判決未給予統一之處理見解情況下，導致機關間對於各採購案發生各款停權處分競合時，有不同作法，包括：擇重處罰者、將所構成之各款要件一次性辦理停權、擇先發生或最後發生之款次，甚或先將一款停權事由執行完畢後，再執行另外一款次之停權事由等不同之處理方式。當廠商的行為構成多款停權事由遭機關之停權處分時，機關依各自思維判斷及裁處方式，造成法的不安定性問題。本文首先闡明政府採購法及停權

制度之性質及規範目的，及說明何謂行政罰下之競合理論，接續針對構成停權事由競合時應如何適用該競合理論之規範，及可能構成競合之款項作分析與檢討，並輔以整理機關遇此競合情形時各自為政之實務判決案例，最後對於停權制度所衍生之競合問題進行分析評論及建議，提供主管機關、採購機關與司法實務做參考，讓我國採購法之停權制度能更臻完善。關鍵字：政府採購法、停權制度、停權事由、一事不二罰、競合理論

Suzuki: The Man and His Dream to Teach the Children of the World

為了解決Not otherwise的問題，作者Hotta, Eri 這樣論述：

The remarkable life of violinist and teacher Shinichi Suzuki, who pioneered an innovative but often-misunderstood philosophy of early childhood education--now known the world over as the Suzuki Method.The name Shinichi Suzuki is synonymous with early childhood musical education. By the time of hi

s death in 1998, countless children around the world had been taught using his methods, with many more to follow. Yet Suzuki’s life and the evolution of his educational vision remain largely unexplored. A committed humanist, he was less interested in musical genius than in imparting to young people

the skills and confidence to learn. Eri Hotta details Suzuki’s unconventional musical development and the emergence of his philosophy. She follows Suzuki from his youth working in his father’s Nagoya violin factory to his studies in interwar Berlin, the beginnings of his teaching career in 1930s Tok

yo, and the steady flourishing of his practice at home and abroad after the Second World War. As Hotta shows, Suzuki’s aim was never to turn out disciplined prodigies but rather to create a world where all children have the chance to develop, musically and otherwise. Undergirding his pedagogy was an

unflagging belief that talent, far from being an inborn quality, is cultivated through education. Moreover, Suzuki’s approach debunked myths of musical nationalism in the West, where many doubted that Asian performers could communicate the spirit of classical music rooted in Europe. Suzuki touched

the world through a pedagogy founded on the conviction that all children possess tremendous capacity to learn. His story offers not only a fresh perspective on early childhood education but also a gateway to the fraught history of musical border-drawing and to the makings of a globally influential l

ife in Japan’s tumultuous twentieth century.

中文條件句「除非」之語意分析

為了解決Not otherwise的問題，作者李竺芹 這樣論述：

摘要    『除非』一詞在過去的研究有許多爭議，但在過去的研究裡缺乏進一步的解釋，也尚未有結論。關於『除非』的研究，主要有幾種說法。一是其為正面的條件標記(positive conditional marker)，並且和同為正向條件標記的『只有』相似。另一說法是『除非』是負面的條件標記(negative conditional marker)，此說法認為『除非』和『除了』相似。還有一些學者認為這兩種解釋都通，『除非』的語意同時包含了正面和負面，但一個詞同時包含了正面與負面的語意，在人的直觀上並不合理。本文主要是探討『除非』的爭議原因，並予其合理的解釋。解決『除非』爭議的關鍵在『否則』的語意功

能，本文採用郭進屘 (2018, 2021)對『否則』在語意上的定義，來分析『否則』在『除非』句的影響。這能釐清『除非』為正面或負面標記的議題。本文更進一步探討『除非』的語意，『除非』為複合詞，Bauer (2013)用語意的角度細分了複合詞，從其理論能細分『除非』為複合詞當中，『除』與『非』是由『和』連結語意(conjunctive)相連(與並列結構的定義相似)。此外，本文點出『除非』難以直接對應英文的unless，在Geis (1973), Declerck & Reed (2000)和Leslie (2008)的理論中，以連接詞能使用『和』(and)或者『或』(or)來辨析unless的

語意，然而其特徵和『除非』並不相應。本文深究除非的爭議原因，予其合理的解釋，並以語意的角度更進一步地探討『除非』之意。