Fossil Group的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列懶人包和總整理

Energy Conversion: Technological Aspects and Ethical Considerations

為了解決Fossil Group的問題，作者Kiefer, Johannes,Hillerbrand, Rafaela 這樣論述：

Johannes Kiefer is a lecturer in chemical engineering at the University of Aberdeen, Scotland. After his undergraduate studies in chemical engineering, he did a doctoral degree in the area of laser-based combustion diagnostics at the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany with research visits at

the University of Lund, Sweden and the Sandia National Labs Livermore, USA. A focus of his current research is the investigation of modern energy conversion technologies including new combustion concepts and fuel cells, the characterization of fossil and renewable fuels, and the monitoring of chemic

al and biotechnological processes. Kiefer has received a number of prizes including the 2009 Award of the Staedler Foundation for his PhD thesis and the 2009 WLT-Award of the German Scientific Society for Laser Technology for his contributions to the development and application of lasers. Rafaela Hi

llerbrand is head of the research group Ethics for Energy Technology at the Human Technology Centre (HumTec) at RWTH Aachen University, Germany. Before joining HumTec Rafaela Hillerbrand worked as a senior research fellow at the University of Oxford on epistemological and ethical problems for decisi

ons under risk and uncertainty. Hillerbrand’s research traverse philosophy of science, particularly philosophy of physics and the Earth sciences and applied ethics. Hillerbrand holds a PhD in theoretical physics as well as a PhD in philosophy. For her book on the ethics of technology she received th

e Lilli-Bechmann-Rahn-Preis of the University Erlangen Nürnberg in 2005. Her PhD in physics was awarded the Ingrid-zu-Solms Naturwissenschaftspreis 2008. She is an elected member of the German Young Academy of Sciences (Junge Akademie).

Fossil Group進入發燒排行的影片

離網型微電網之再生能源系統容量規劃與技術經濟分析

為了解決Fossil Group的問題，作者Teketay Mulu Beza 這樣論述：

對於埃塞俄比亞等撒哈拉以南非洲的發展中國家政府來說，實現普遍電力接入一直是一個具有挑戰性的目標。將國家電網延伸至地處偏遠、分散的島嶼人口需要巨大的投資。同樣，由於燃料價格以及污染物排放氣體，獨立的柴油發電機需要巨大的運營成本。另一方面，提供 1 級和 2 級電力的小型太陽能家庭系統無法提供生產用途所需的能源。因此，需要一個中間解決方案來填補離網社區的能源貧困。如今，根據特定場地的環境條件，離網社區已考慮使用以太陽能和風能為主的混合可再生能源系統。與此同時，最近光伏電池板和風力渦輪機成本的急劇下降為利用混合可再生能源系統滿足不同國家的電力需求提供了機會。本研究旨在通過使用能源混合優化模型 (H

OMER Pro) 軟件執行模擬、優化和敏感性分析，研究微型電網混合可再生能源系統為埃塞俄比亞 Kibran Gabriel 島供電的技術經濟可行性。將微型電網系統與獨立的柴油發電和電網擴展系統進行了比較。比較結果證實，微電網系統優於單機柴油發電機組和併網系統。此外，與指定站點的光伏/風/電池、光伏/風/柴油/電池和光伏/電池系統等其他微型電網系統相比，光伏/柴油/電池混合系統是成本最低的系統。根據分析，最佳成本效益的微型電網系統是一種包括潮流 (LF) 策略的系統，其中包含 25 kW PV、10 kW 柴油發電機、40 kWh 電池和 5kW 雙向變流器。最優的光伏/柴油/電池系統，平均能

源成本 (COE) 為 0.175 美元/千瓦時，淨現成本 (NPC) 為 119,139 美元，可再生摩擦 (RF) 為 86.4%，減少污染物排放 33,101.69 千克/與獨立的柴油動力系統相比。在敏感性分析中考慮了對總水平輻照度 (GHI)、柴油價格和負載消耗變化的最佳微型電網敏感性。結果證實，在 GHI、柴油價格和負載消耗等不確定參數的變化下，系統將運行良好。

Fossil Future: Why Global Human Flourishing Requires More Oil, Coal, and Natural Gas--Not Less

為了解決Fossil Group的問題，作者Epstein, Alexander J. 這樣論述：

The New York Times bestselling author of The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels draws on the latest data and new insights to challenge everything you thought you knew about the future of energyFor over a decade, philosopher and energy expert Alex Epstein has predicted that any negative impacts of fossil

fuel use on our climate will be outweighed by the unique benefits of fossil fuels to human flourishing--including their unrivaled ability to provide low-cost, reliable energy to billions of people around the world, especially the world’s poorest people. And contrary to what we hear from media ＂expe

rts＂ about today’s ＂renewable revolution＂ and ＂climate emergency,＂ reality has proven Epstein right: Fact: Fossil fuels are still the dominant source of energy around the world, and growing fast--while much-hyped renewables are causing skyrocketing electricity prices and increased blackouts.Fact: Fo

ssil-fueled development has brought global poverty to an all-time low.Fact: While fossil fuels have contributed to the 1 degree of warming in the last 170 years, climate-related deaths are at all-time lows thanks to fossil-fueled development.What does the future hold? In Fossil Future, Epstein, appl

ying his distinctive ＂human flourishing framework＂ to the latest evidence, comes to the shocking conclusion that the benefits of fossil fuels will continue to far outweigh their side effects--including climate impacts--for generations to come. The path to global human flourishing, Epstein argues, is

a combination of using more fossil fuels, getting better at ＂climate mastery,＂ and establishing ＂energy freedom＂ policies that allow nuclear and other truly promising alternatives to reach their full long-term potential. Today’s pervasive claims of imminent climate catastrophe and imminent renewabl

e energy dominance, Epstein shows, are based on what he calls the ＂anti-impact framework＂--a set of faulty methods, false assumptions, and anti-human values that have caused the media’s designated experts to make wildly wrong predictions about fossil fuels, climate, and renewables for the last fifty

years. Deeply researched and wide-ranging, this book will cause you to rethink everything you thought you knew about the future of our energy use, our environment, and our climate.

Investigating CO2 Emissions of Indonesia\'s Construction Activities Based on Multi-regional Input-Output Analysis and Ecological Network Analysis

為了解決Fossil Group的問題，作者李輝慈 這樣論述：

Indonesia relies mostly on fossil fuels for electricity generation, transportation, and industry use, mainly coming from oil (35%), coal (37.3%), gas (18.5%) in 2019. The usage of these non-renewable resources leads to a dilemma in policy priority between economic growth and pollution reduction. Th

e construction sector plays a crucial role in Indonesia’s economy over the last decade. Construction activities require immense energy for processing raw materials into final products, transportation, and on-site operation. While the research on construction emissions is extensive, there is very lim

ited research on direct, embodied, and abroad emissions emitted by Indonesia’s construction sector. This study intends to investigate the economic impacts along with energy-related CO2 emissions induced by Indonesia's construction activities with multi-regional input-output analysis and ecological n

etwork analysis for the years 2004, 2007, 2011, and 2014. The findings are compared to those of Malaysia and Thailand to understand the relative composition and trend of emissions. From 2004 to 2014, the output multipliers of the Indonesian construction sector show a slight decline, but with a stead

y increase in the embodied emissions generated. In general, the consumption-based emissions are 6%-28.25% higher than the production-based emissions. Around 94.9%-96.79% are indirect emissions and 69.74-84.44% of total emissions are controlled by the other sectors. The biggest contributors are Elect

ricity, Manufacturing, and Transportation & Storage.