Alex 櫃 Dcard的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列懶人包和總整理

房地產股權式群眾募資平台在臺灣發展可行性之探討

為了解決Alex 櫃 Dcard的問題，作者蘇永然 這樣論述：

Capital raising as a function is critical to the development of investment vehicles. Even though real estate is one of the earliest traditional investment classes, the birth of real estate crowdfunding, after the JOBS Act of 2012, has revolutionized the industry to allow crowd investors’ participat

ion in the previously closed and exclusive market. Regulatory modifications and investor engagement along the way have largely driven its growth and proliferation. While the real estate crowdfunding business model proves successful in the United States, it is fascinating to consider what market cond

itions are required for a successful implementation in Taiwan and what benefits would the establishment bring about. This case study analysis concluded that real estate crowdfunding has not yet entered the Taiwanese market due to Taiwan’s special political and legal environment. With proper governme

ntal support and guidance, as well as localization tailoring, real estate crowdfunding would thrive given Taiwan’s unique marketplace. Small-and-medium real estate firms and crowd investors would be the direct beneficiaries, whereas, from the macro perspective, real estate crowdfunding will promote

innovation and entrepreneurship leading to eventual economic growth.

船舶油污染侵害國際商港之民事責任

為了解決Alex 櫃 Dcard的問題，作者陳奕澄 這樣論述：

臺灣規範船舶油污染民事責任的主要法源為海洋污染防治法（簡稱海污法），經比較法的觀察，與1969年油污損害民事責任國際公約之1992年議定書（簡稱CLC1992）存在下列差異：例如地理要件、船的要件、油的要件、責任主體、排他條款、免責事由、污染損害的定義、強制保險及直接訴權、時效、管轄權及外國判決之承認與執行等，此等差異皆是海污法未來修法所需注意之事項。國際商港之客體性質為公共信託財產，屬於民事客體，可為物權之客體。商港水域所有權在實質上屬於全體國民，名義上為國家所有；透過制定法之授權，將商港水域經營權轉化為港務公司私有，並課予公共信託義務之限制。海污法修法時應明確污染損害之定義，包含清除油污

染、復原及預防措施費用、財產損害、環境損害、純粹經濟上損失及懲罰性賠償。至於非財產損害應非海污法污染損害之求償範圍，如適用民法第195條第1項，宜引入「觸碰法則」而限制之。船舶所有人責任限制之制度設計考量從一開始鼓勵航海之特權，轉變成為務實考量－部分賠償優於完全無法受償。因此，有必要將限責基金之設立作為行使責任限制之要件。此外，宜授權主管機關以法規命令定期檢討限責金額。強制責任保險之直接請求權應定性為被害人的特別權利，其行使要件、抗辯事由及時效等，有待立法補充。此外，縱使CLC1992明列抗辦事由，但妨訴抗辯是否屬於CLC1992所列抗辯事由仍有爭議，海污法修法時應特別釐清。CLC1969、C

LC1992及燃油公約，對於外國判決之承認與執行均以自動承認為原則。相較而言，臺灣非公約締約國，臺灣船舶油污染民事責任判決在外國之承認與執行將遭遇較多的法律實務阻礙。