Greenwashing example的問題,透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列懶人包和總整理

Greenwashing example的問題,我們搜遍了碩博士論文和台灣出版的書籍,推薦Mann, Michael E.寫的 The New Climate War: The Fight to Take Back Our Planet 和Mann, Michael E.的 The New Climate War: The Fight to Take Back Our Planet都 可以從中找到所需的評價。

這兩本書分別來自 和所出版 。

銘傳大學 財務金融學系碩士班 王佑鈞所指導 杜曉錡的 基金類型與 ESG 事件對永續基金績效之影響 (2021),提出Greenwashing example關鍵因素是什麼,來自於永續基金、環境、社會與公司治理、多因子模型、事件研究法。

而第二篇論文國立陽明交通大學 傳播研究所 李秀珠所指導 簡廷恩的 後危機應對策略: 以違反預期理論及企業社會責任應對策略為例。 (2021),提出因為有 違反預期理論、企業社會責任、危機期間、危機後、危機應對策略的重點而找出了 Greenwashing example的解答。

接下來讓我們看這些論文和書籍都說些什麼吧:

除了Greenwashing example,大家也想知道這些:

The New Climate War: The Fight to Take Back Our Planet

為了解決Greenwashing example的問題,作者Mann, Michael E. 這樣論述:

Shortlisted for the FT/McKinsey Business Book of the Year awardA renowned climate scientist shows how fossil fuel companies have waged a thirty-year campaign to deflect blame and responsibility and delay action on climate change, and offers a battle plan for how we can save the planet.Recycle. Fl

y less. Eat less meat. These are some of the ways that we’ve been told can slow climate change. But the inordinate emphasis on individual behavior is the result of a marketing campaign that has succeeded in placing the responsibility for fixing climate change squarely on the shoulders of individuals

.Fossil fuel companies have followed the example of other industries deflecting blame (think "guns don’t kill people, people kill people") or greenwashing (think of the beverage industry’s "Crying Indian" commercials of the 1970s). Meanwhile, they’ve blocked efforts to regulate or price carbon emiss

ions, run PR campaigns aimed at discrediting viable alternatives, and have abdicated their responsibility in fixing the problem they’ve created. The result has been disastrous for our planet. In The New Climate War, Mann argues that all is not lost. He draws the battle lines between the people and t

he polluters-fossil fuel companies, right-wing plutocrats, and petrostates. And he outlines a plan for forcing our governments and corporations to wake up and make real change, including: A common-sense, attainable approach to carbon pricing- and a revision of the well-intentioned but flawed current

ly proposed version of the Green New Deal;Allowing renewable energy to compete fairly against fossil fuelsDebunking the false narratives and arguments that have worked their way into the climate debate and driven a wedge between even those who support climate change solutionsCombatting climate doomi

sm and despair-mongering With immensely powerful vested interests aligned in defense of the fossil fuel status quo, the societal tipping point won’t happen without the active participation of citizens everywhere aiding in the collective push forward. This book will reach, inform, and enable citizens

everywhere to join this battle for our planet.

基金類型與 ESG 事件對永續基金績效之影響

為了解決Greenwashing example的問題,作者杜曉錡 這樣論述:

環境、社會與公司治理(Environmental, Social, and Governance,簡稱ESG)議題近期逐漸由自願性倡議轉為強制性規範的趨勢,督促企業重視ESG實質作為及資訊揭露,形成永續投資機會。為瞭解永續投資是否有顯著成效,本研究以230檔永續基金做為研究樣本,比較不同永續相關事件對各種類型永續基金績效的影響。研究期間為2005年1月25日至2021年底。實證結果發現,永續基金超額報酬小於零,主動型基金的超額報酬則優於被動型基金。在事件研究法中,永續基金不受ESG事件的影響,但不同類型的永續基金則可能在不同事件時受到不同影響,例如,在Omiron疫情期間,本研究發現全球基金

不具有抗跌效果,單一地區基金則較具抗跌效果,與先前研究2020疫情期間ESG投資抗跌之相關文獻正面看法(Omura等人, 2021)及反面看法(Pavlova和de Boyrie, 2022)互補。

The New Climate War: The Fight to Take Back Our Planet

為了解決Greenwashing example的問題,作者Mann, Michael E. 這樣論述:

  Shortlisted for the FT/McKinsey Business Book of the Year award   A renowned climate scientist shows how fossil fuel companies have waged a thirty-year campaign to deflect blame and responsibility and delay action on climate change, and offers a battle plan for how we can save the planet.   Recy

cle. Fly less. Eat less meat. These are some of the ways that we've been told can slow climate change. But the inordinate emphasis on individual behavior is the result of a marketing campaign that has succeeded in placing the responsibility for fixing climate change squarely on the shoulders of indi

viduals.   Fossil fuel companies have followed the example of other industries deflecting blame (think "guns don't kill people, people kill people") or greenwashing (think of the beverage industry's "Crying Indian" commercials of the 1970s). Meanwhile, they've blocked efforts to regulate or price c

arbon emissions, run PR campaigns aimed at discrediting viable alternatives, and have abdicated their responsibility in fixing the problem they've created. The result has been disastrous for our planet.   In The New Climate War, Mann argues that all is not lost. He draws the battle lines between th

e people and the polluters-fossil fuel companies, right-wing plutocrats, and petrostates. And he outlines a plan for forcing our governments and corporations to wake up and make real change, including:   •A common-sense, attainable approach to carbon pricing- and a revision of the well-intentioned

but flawed currently proposed version of the Green New Deal;   •Allowing renewable energy to compete fairly against fossil fuels   •Debunking the false narratives and arguments that have worked their way into the climate debate and driven a wedge between even those who support climate change solutio

ns   •Combatting climate doomism and despair-mongering   With immensely powerful vested interests aligned in defense of the fossil fuel status quo, the societal tipping point won't happen without the active participation of citizens everywhere aiding in the collective push forward. This book will r

each, inform, and enable citizens everywhere to join this battle for our planet. Michael E. Mann is Distinguished Professor of Atmospheric Science at Penn State, with joint appointments in the Department of Geosciences and the Earth and Environmental Systems Institute. He has received many honors

and awards, including NOAA’s outstanding publication award in 2002 and selection by Scientific American as one of the fifty leading visionaries in science and technology in 2002. Additionally, he contributed, with other IPCC authors, to the award of the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize. More recently, he rece

ived the Award for Public Engagement with Science from the American Association for the Advancement of Science in 2018 and the Climate Communication Prize from the American Geophysical Union in 2018. In 2019 he received the Tyler Prize for Environmental Achievement. He is the author of numerous book

s, including Dire Predictions: Understanding Climate Change, The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars: Dispatches from the Front Lines, and The Madhouse Effect: How Climate Change Denial is Threatening our Planet, Destroying Our Politics, and Driving Us Crazy. He lives in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

後危機應對策略: 以違反預期理論及企業社會責任應對策略為例。

為了解決Greenwashing example的問題,作者簡廷恩 這樣論述:

中文摘要 ……………………………………………………………………………...i英文摘要 ……………………………………………………………………………..ii目錄 ……………………………………………………………………………….....iii圖目錄 …………………………………………………………………………….....vi表目錄 ………………………………………………………………………...…….vii第一章 緒論 ………………………………………………………………..………..1第一節 研究背景及動機 ……………………………………………….……...1第二章 文獻探討 ……………………………………………

………………………6第一節 企業危機 ……………………………………………….………….......6一、 企業危機之定義 ……………………………………………………..6二、 危機類型及歸因 ……………………………………………………..6三、 企業危機管理 ………………………………………………………..7第二節 企業聲譽 ………………………………………………………………8一、 企業聲譽之定義 ……………………………………………………..8二、 企業聲譽之作用 ……………………………………………………..9三、 企業聲譽在危機中扮演的角色 ……………………………

……....10四、 相關實證研究 ……………………………………………………....10第三節 違反預期理論(Expectancy Violations Theory, EVT)……………..11一、 理論背景 ……………………………………………………………11二、 將違反預期理論運用於組織 ………………………………………13三、 企業聲譽作用的矛盾 ………………………………………………14四、 相關實證研究 ………………………………………………………16第四節 善因行銷(Cause-Related Marketing, CRM)………………………..17一、

何謂善因行銷 ………………………………………………...…….17二、 善因行銷之益處 ……………………………………………………18三、 影響善因行銷之因素 ………………………………………………19第五節 企業社會責任(Corporate Social Responsibility, CSR)…………….20一、 企業社會責任之定義 ………………………………………………20二、 施行企業社會責任之目標及動機 …………………………………22三、 企業社會責任之益處 ………………………………………………22四、 企業社會責任在危機中之作用 ………………………

……………24第六節 危機階段及應對策略 …………………………………………………24一、 危機前應對策略(pre-crisis response strategies)…………………25二、 危機期間應對策略(crisis response strategies)…………………..25三、 危機後應對策略(post-crisis response strategies)………………..26第七節 危機後應對策略 ……………………………………………………...28一、 關聯網絡理論(associative network theory, ANT)……………….28二、

策略一:企業–善因契合的作法 ………………………………....30三、 策略二:消費者–善因契合的作法 ………………………………32第八節 消費者懷疑主義(consumer skepticism)……………………………37一、 懷疑主義的定義 ……………………………………………………37二、 懷疑主義與CSR之關聯 …………………………………………..38三、 消費者懷疑主義之原因 ……………………………………………39四、 消費者懷疑主義的影響 ……………………………………………40第九節 研究問題及假設 ………………………………………………………41一、

違反預期理論及企業聲譽 …………………………………………41二、 危機後應對策略的作用 ……………………………………………42三、 消費者懷疑主義的作用 ……………………………………………43第三章 研究方法 …………………………………………………………………..45第一節 前測(pilot study)………………………………………………….. 45一、 前測刺激物 …………………………………………………………45二、 前測流程 ……………………………………………………………47三、 描述性統計 …………………………………………………………47四、

前測結果 ……………………………………………………………48第二節 正式實驗 ………………………………………………………………51一、 實驗刺激物(stimulus)…………………………………………….51二、 研究變項及測量方式 ………………………………………………53三、 實驗流程 ……………………………………………………………55四、 因素分析及信度分析 ………………………………………………56五、 統計工具 ……………………………………………………………65第四章 研究發現與討論 …………………………………………………………..66第一節 研究發現 ………

………………………………………………………66一、 人口結構分析 ………………………………………………………66二、 模型適配度(goodness-of-fit)……………………………………..67三、 假設檢驗 ……………………………………………………………69第二節 研究發現之討論 ………………………………………………………75一、 檢驗違反預期理論的適用性 ………………………………………76二、 企業聲譽的作用 ……………………………………………………78三、 不同策略的的正向效果是否比對照組更好 ………………………80四、 消費者對不同策略的懷

疑態度 ……………………………………81五、 不同策略之效果及消費者懷疑態度的作用 ………………………83第五章 結論 ………………………………………………………………………..87第一節 研究結論 ..............................................................................................87第二節 研究限制與建議 ..................................................................................89參考文獻

……………………………………………………….…………………...91附錄 ………………………………………………………………………………..111